Comments on: EcoFont | Less is more http://webtoolkit4.me/2008/12/15/ecofont-less-is-more/ Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:11:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Ruth http://webtoolkit4.me/2008/12/15/ecofont-less-is-more/comment-page-1/#comment-171 Ruth Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:38:04 +0000 http://webtoolkit4.me/?p=240#comment-171 I have to agree with typecutter - if it were not that close to Christmas, I'd wonder if it was not April 1st. Why not use an outline font? At 9pt, the whole thing would fill in anyway - more than likely due to "spread". Look - simple way to save ink - print the whole document in 2pt type, wait for it - on ELASTIC paper. Gee whizz - whatever next - maybe a "dot matrix" font... I have to agree with typecutter – if it were not that close to Christmas, I’d wonder if it was not April 1st.

Why not use an outline font? At 9pt, the whole thing would fill in anyway – more than likely due to “spread”.

Look – simple way to save ink – print the whole document in 2pt type, wait for it – on ELASTIC paper. Gee whizz – whatever next – maybe a “dot matrix” font…

]]> By: Gerasimos http://webtoolkit4.me/2008/12/15/ecofont-less-is-more/comment-page-1/#comment-166 Gerasimos Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:33:18 +0000 http://webtoolkit4.me/?p=240#comment-166 Um.. in my 3 lines paragraph i do mention that according to the developers someone could save 20% of ink. I downloaded the font, wrote something, printed it out and looks good to me. Aight? Um.. in my 3 lines paragraph i do mention that according to the developers someone could save 20% of ink. I downloaded the font, wrote something, printed it out and looks good to me. Aight?

]]> By: Typecutter http://webtoolkit4.me/2008/12/15/ecofont-less-is-more/comment-page-1/#comment-165 Typecutter Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:14:28 +0000 http://webtoolkit4.me/?p=240#comment-165 What?! Could you please do me a favour: leave it to people who know what they're talking about or at least write in a more objective way. That font font is mere crap! Nothing more and nothing less. It's not legible and it doesn't save anything compared to condensed or office optimised fonts which would also save paper! Aight?! What?! Could you please do me a favour: leave it to people who know what they’re talking about or at least write in a more objective way. That font font is mere crap! Nothing more and nothing less. It’s not legible and it doesn’t save anything compared to condensed or office optimised fonts which would also save paper! Aight?!

]]>