<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexy Combo &#8211;  a jQuery Plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webtoolkit4.me/2009/02/25/sexy-combo-a-jquery-plugin-drop-down-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webtoolkit4.me/2009/02/25/sexy-combo-a-jquery-plugin-drop-down-replacement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wholesale uggs</title>
		<link>http://webtoolkit4.me/2009/02/25/sexy-combo-a-jquery-plugin-drop-down-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>wholesale uggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webtoolkit4.me/?p=306#comment-922</guid>
		<description>It is worth sharing,will you please show more good ideas in the feture?Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is worth sharing,will you please show more good ideas in the feture?Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Loxton</title>
		<link>http://webtoolkit4.me/2009/02/25/sexy-combo-a-jquery-plugin-drop-down-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Loxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webtoolkit4.me/?p=306#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Really? Is it just me or do most browsers have more usable select boxes already. Especially that conventions have already been set. E.g, open one of the select boxes, choose something; realise you made a mistake and click the open thing again...WTF there&#039;s only the option you&#039;ve already selected. *10 seconds later* oh... it&#039;s not a select box but an overly complicated auto-completion box. This is not a combo or select box, this is auto completion. 

Sexy? In IE6 maybe, try looking at it on a mac in FF3 or Safari, they stand out like sore thumbs, the browser has access to native styled controls... and uses them.

Making custom selects is a nice experiment, but to use them has to be done very carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Is it just me or do most browsers have more usable select boxes already. Especially that conventions have already been set. E.g, open one of the select boxes, choose something; realise you made a mistake and click the open thing again&#8230;WTF there&#8217;s only the option you&#8217;ve already selected. *10 seconds later* oh&#8230; it&#8217;s not a select box but an overly complicated auto-completion box. This is not a combo or select box, this is auto completion. </p>
<p>Sexy? In IE6 maybe, try looking at it on a mac in FF3 or Safari, they stand out like sore thumbs, the browser has access to native styled controls&#8230; and uses them.</p>
<p>Making custom selects is a nice experiment, but to use them has to be done very carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creating Custom Select Elements - My Tech World</title>
		<link>http://webtoolkit4.me/2009/02/25/sexy-combo-a-jquery-plugin-drop-down-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Creating Custom Select Elements - My Tech World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webtoolkit4.me/?p=306#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] Webtoolkit4.me : Sexy Combo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Webtoolkit4.me : Sexy Combo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 257/258 objects using disk: basic

Served from: webtoolkit4.me @ 2012-02-07 22:50:39 -->
